I agree that some level of government is absolutely essential, and you're right, bad actors would do even more damage than they already do. I don't think it's c

I agree that some level of government is absolutely essential, and you're right, bad actors would do even more damage than they already do. I don't think it's clear what that level is (Libertarian vs. Socialist), but I'm skeptical we can have a reasonable discussion about it until we reduce financial influence in politics. The lack of trust is due to the image of politicians shaking hands and benefiting from corporate spend (Citizens United etc.). Significantly reduce that influence and work towards earning the trust of the people back. The whole "Drain the Swamp" con got a lot of votes. On it's face, the situation is obviously ridiculous isn't it? 1. Politicians need large sums of money to win elections (problem #1). 2. Corporations and wealthy individuals are allowed to provide that money (problem #2). 3. We expect politicians to police their donors (obvious conflict). When there's riches (and power... but that's unavoidable) involved you end up with more opportunists than idealists.