3 ms·
It would be easier to take this article seriously if: 1) The author didn’t misspell the names of the people he’s talking about. It’s George Filer. (“Filir”? Re
by browsercoin 8y ago
It would be easier to take this article seriously if:
1) The author didn’t misspell the names of the people he’s talking about. It’s George Filer. (“Filir”? Really?) Also, Ed Snowden, not “Snowdon.”
2) The author didn’t denigrate witnesses of significant stature who would be trusted as impeccable sources if they offered opinions on something other than UFOs (multiple NASA astronauts, highly placed intelligence officials, former heads of state, NATO commanders…you know, people who just might possibly know a tad more about the subject than the author)
3) The author knew the full history Carl Sagan, who concluded in his seminal book with the Russian scientist Shklovskii that Earth is likely to have been visited by space faring civilizations at least “every 10,000 years.” And this was decades before we knew earthlike planets pervade the universe.
Then again, nobody would come to skeptic.com expecting anything but blind skepticism toward subjects that are already ruled off-limits by professional pseudoskeptics like Michael Shermer.
- b2ccb2 8y agoSure, copy the criticism of the comments and repost 'em here (Hah, he misspelled a name, therefore I am right, and he is wrong), and "impeccable sources"? Anecdotal is still anecdotal. 3. Bullshit and 4. Personal attack, classy Also, please address my points, instead of bashing exactly one of my mentioned source
- browsercoin 8y agoI think my point has been made and no I won't engage in endless banter with someone who uses an unreliable secondary resource.