He may not be a huckster, just self-deluded -- poorly educated in statistics, math, and the ways of science. It's possible he sincerely believed his so-called "

He may not be a huckster, just self-deluded -- poorly educated in statistics, math, and the ways of science. It's possible he sincerely believed his so-called "discoveries!" Regardless, I agree he does not deserve to be called a "scientist." Calling him one is an insult to actual scientists.