4 ms·
The contents of that chart are purely factual. There's very little room for bias unless you want to nitpick on trivial things like what shade of green he used f
by Ajedi32 8y ago
The contents of that chart are purely factual. There's very little room for bias unless you want to nitpick on trivial things like what shade of green he used for the font on the price figures.
- gervase 8y agoThe bias the parent refers to is implicit, I believe, in the selection of information to convey. That is, the choice of which columns and rows to include in the graph in the first place. They could have included a row for "Open platform for games", or "Has finger detection", etc. Alternatively, they could have included columns for Vive, or Vive+Wireless, and so on. This kind of implicit bias is very difficult to avoid, however; in general, viewers of ANY online media should already be assuming the viewpoints they're consuming are biased in the first place. In particular, since the source is the /r/oculus subreddit, anyone viewing this information there (1) already assumes this implicit bias, and (2) is likely to share it.
- SquareWheel 8y agoThis particular chart is comprised only of Oculus products. The bias is much more evident when comparing a Vive or other third-party headset. Little emphasis is put on their advantages - only disadvantages. If you're familiar with P-Hacking, then you know how even "factual information" can be misrepresented.