3 ms·
If that's true, it says to me that governments should put a blanket block on doing certain types of business with that specific country. Such a block should app
by beaner 8y ago
If that's true, it says to me that governments should put a blanket block on doing certain types of business with that specific country. Such a block should apply to all companies equally. It doesn't require them to be more involved in decisions from within the companies.
- toss1 8y agoAbsolutely, it should be written to block all companies equally. But in must be written
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- akiselev 8y agoWhy though? We draw lines about what is legally acceptable or not all the time, often with little more guidance than subjective morality filtered through elected representation. There is a vast difference between Hugo Boss making Nazi uniforms and IBM selling them high tech machines designed to increase the efficiency of their extermination.
- beaner 8y agoI'm not sure what you mean. I agree that there is a difference. So there should be a law blocking the 2nd type of activity. The lack of a law is implicit moral approval of the American people.
- int_19h 8y ago> The lack of a law is implicit moral approval of the American people. Not at all. At most - if you assume that the political system is meaningfully representative of moral sentiment, which is a very big "if" - it is the lack of explicit disapproval, which is not the same as the lack of disapproval in general (because it could just be that most people don't judge because they don't know), and certainly not at all the same as approval.