None of that is an argument for or against the CoC, though, is it? Just because something can be survived doesn't make it a good idea, does it? > Linux will no

None of that is an argument for or against the CoC, though, is it? Just because something can be survived doesn't make it a good idea, does it? > Linux will not be destroyed by a CoC that tries to be more inclusive even if there are attempts at abusing that CoC. Also, apart from the fact that this isn't an argument in favor: How do you know that? Also, how does it try to be more inclusive by declaring more behavior off limits? I mean, it's a set of rules that mostly specifies what you can be banned for. Now, you might also dislike those things that are declared unacceptable ... but that doesn't really make it more inclusive, does it? And mind you I am not saying that being more exclusive is necessarily a bad thing, but I very much dislike this kind of newspeak because it seems manipulative to me.