> there is obviously nothing objectionable about it I beg to differ. It's innocuous only at the most superficial level. Even a moment's reflection on how it fo

> there is obviously nothing objectionable about it I beg to differ. It's innocuous only at the most superficial level. Even a moment's reflection on how it focuses on what one may not do to address any kind of conflict, without providing alternatives, makes it pretty darn clear that this is not intended as an honest complement or critique of codes of conduct. It's more an instrument of sabotage, and that's pretty objectionable.