I never found a company which would judge OSS contributions negatively and I've seen quite a few of them (I tend to change job very often and I've 10+ years of

I never found a company which would judge OSS contributions negatively and I've seen quite a few of them (I tend to change job very often and I've 10+ years of working experience). I am wondering whether the author of the blogpost considered the option that what they were telling him was just an excuse. Maybe the problem is not his OSS but the fact that the author behaviour in the community is not exactly as brilliant as he may think and that made him a controversial figure? Of course, being anonymous means you can start any flame you like, treat people as you want and get away with it; not sure that that's the best way to achieve less toxic communities anyway.