Looks intriguing and interesting. You could make the use case more explicit, in, how would people use it: * the publisher; having the original version of the

Looks intriguing and interesting. You could make the use case more explicit, in, how would people use it: * the publisher; having the original version of the text, and releasing a censored version; * a casual reader; reading and verifying the released text was not altered (without having access to keywords? at all?) - so there's a matter of trust to add here as well? * a reader with the key to verify and reveal the keywords