3 ms·
J&J is a for-profit company. Nothing to do with the advancement of healthcare, as it does for profits. The same way Microsoft is not for Open Source, no matter
by boards2x 16y ago
J&J is a for-profit company. Nothing to do with the advancement of healthcare, as it does for profits. The same way Microsoft is not for Open Source, no matter how many white-papers they'll publish (and then contradict with yet another FUDish commercial, article, statement etc.)
- prat 16y ago"Using Software to Enhance Healthcare" This article is about a software - and it does enhance healthcare, albeit for profit. you mean nothing good ever came from a for-profit non-open source company?
- JunkDNA 16y agoNormally I won't take the bait on comments like this. But today my filter isn't working so well... There are tons of researchers (the people this software is targeted towards) inside for-profit pharmaceutical companies who spend their entire lives trying to advance healthcare. I'm not saying everyone who works at a pharma is an automatic saint, far from it. But, people who work on the research side are genuinely motivated by the desire to make the world a better place and cure disease. It's a good thing too, because the work on its own sucks. You spend months or even years on something promising, only to find out it's a failure for reasons completely unknown to you (biology is a fickle thing). Then you pick up, and go back to the drawing board. If you're exceedingly lucky, maybe one or two things you've worked on in your career will become an actual drug. If it weren't for the knowledge that your work might actually help someone some day, it would be awfully hard to get out of bed in the morning.