4 ms·
Not to take away anything from Allied codebreaking efforts, I find that _Axis_ codebreaking efforts (against the Allies) before and during WW2 are underdocument
by basementcat 8y ago
Not to take away anything from Allied codebreaking efforts, I find that _Axis_ codebreaking efforts (against the Allies) before and during WW2 are underdocumented. I suspect some of this underdocumentation may be due to the Allies continuing to use WW2 cipher equipment into the Korean War.
TL;DR The Germans also built their own cipher analysis machines and were able to decode a substantial amount of Allied message traffic.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_code_breaking_in_World_War_II https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_code_breaking_in_World_...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cipher_Department_of_the_High_Command_of_the_Wehrmacht#Rapid_analytic_machinery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cipher_Department_of_the_High_...
[3] http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/ETO/Ultra/SRH-009/SRH009-6.html http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/ETO/Ultra/SRH-009/SRH009-6.h...
- kiwijimm 8y agoThe thing the allies did know and the Germans largely ignored was the fact that their Ciphers could be vulnerable. They tested them. Despite some pockets of dissent the Germans thought enigma was totally secure and never subjected it to proper analysis from their side. Also the German hierarchy during the war made it difficult for dissenting voices from the ranks to be heard on these topics. Donitz was one exception. He suspected the allies were breaking enigma and hence the security of the naval enigma's was increased. I believe he advocated for more changes but was stopped or ran out of time. After the war the allies sent in teams of intelligence operatives to assess how much the Germans knew about allied codebreaking and intelligence efforts. What they found was that the secrecy of Ultra worked and held throughout the war. James