3 ms·
This is awesome, but am I wrong in thinking that EEG + TMS is a pretty low bandwidth signal? Not sure how useful this will ever be for "cooperative problem solv
by seiferteric 8y ago
This is awesome, but am I wrong in thinking that EEG + TMS is a pretty low bandwidth signal? Not sure how useful this will ever be for "cooperative problem solving by humans using a "social network" of connected brains" as the article mentions.
- MrLeap 8y agoI'd be interested to know an estimated bitrate. Texting is a very low bandwidth signal that has a lot of utility. If it's comparable to what a person can do with two thumbs I can imagine some really awesome things I could create with this tech. I wish I could justify purchasing the hardware, or had an audience. Haha.
- jdpigeon 8y agoYes, very low bandwidth. Active BCIs based on EEG are extremely unreliable and/or exhausting to use
- darkmighty 8y agoI'm also worried about direct interference between EEG and TMS (and EMI is quite common) -- I'd prefer they let the user perform the action physically instead of being electrical-in, electrical-out. The researchers come from an accredited institution, so it probably checks out, but seems like an obvious oversight.