5 ms·
You're gonna have to show some evidence for your accusations, and show how those examples are not against the ToS of those services.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
You're gonna have to show some evidence for your accusations, and show how those examples are not against the ToS of those services.
- stcredzero 8y agoIs simply being a mainstream Republican against the ToS? Since those things are worded so they can mean anything, it's probably technically correct to say so. However, it's petty and dishonest to use that to suppress speech on what's supposedly just a media publishing platform.
- s73v3r_ 8y agoYou were asked to provide evidence for your assertion, and you have failed to do so. Please do so, otherwise everyone will have to conclude that you are not discussing the topic in good faith.
- stcredzero 8y agoUsing logic based on a ToS isn't good faith.
- s73v3r_ 8y agoAgain, you've been asked to show the examples that support your point, and you have failed. Either you actually link the examples, or I have to conclude that you don't actually have any, or you know that none of the people you're talking about were banned for "mainstream conservative views". Put up or shut up. Show what you were referring to, or admit that you don't have anything to complain about.
- stcredzero 8y agoAgain, you've been asked to show the examples that support your point, and you have failed. There is no failure. I reject your premise that logic on a ToS is empty and idiotic, as most other people would.
- s73v3r_ 8y agoYes, there's a failure. You've not provided any evidence that someone was banned because of "conservative views". Not a single shred. Thus, you're clearly not wanting to discuss in good faith, and you just want to feed your conservative persecution complex. Good day.