4 ms·
Pffttt....still on 5 here. Working to change that.
by sigzero 8y ago
Pffttt....still on 5 here. Working to change that.
- akerro 8y ago>Working to change that. How are you planning to move from 5 to 8/11? Our migration from 5/6 to 8 was really painful.
- gizmo385 8y agoI thought the whole point of a backwards compatible language like Java was that transitions should be relatively easy to make?
- toyg 8y agoBackwards-compatible only means you can run old code on new VMs, with the correct target flags; it doesn't say anything about mixing new and old code.
- akerro 8y agoA lot of stuff like ant/maven, other build tools, plugins, libraries broke due to hardening in JVM that puts a lot of more restrictions on reflection.
- ptx 8y agoOn the bright side, Java 5 is a huge improvement over earlier versions – at least you have generics, and you don't have to manually create iterator objects every time you write a loop! (Java ME was stuck on 1.3 until its death.)