4 ms·
> The only way that would be profitable was if every smart tv required a service contract to support such demands, otherwise the model is flawed. That's the po
by crankylinuxuser 8y ago
> The only way that would be profitable was if every smart tv required a service contract to support such demands, otherwise the model is flawed.
That's the point I'm trying to make.
Support your shit properly, or keep the devices dumb.
I prefer dumb, so I can add my own smarts without being tied to some shitty proprietary IoT.
- supernovae 8y agothats not the consumer pattern though, and to be honest, you can get dumb tvs :)
- s73v3r_ 8y agoIf the dumb tv is poorly engineered and sets my house on fire, then I would be able to sue them for liability. I see no reason whatsoever why I should not be able to do the same thing if their software causes issues.