3 ms·
You argue that the business (a collection of individuals) has the right to negotiate with an individual. Then argue that a union (a collection of individuals) s
by josho 8y ago
You argue that the business (a collection of individuals) has the right to negotiate with an individual. Then argue that a union (a collection of individuals) should only have limited rights to negotiate with a business in return.
Do you see the contradiction in your belief?
- seibelj 8y agoI simply disagree, but can you explain to me why government workers, who by definition have a monopoly on their labor, have the right to unionize and strike, holding the taxpayer hostage?
- michaelmrose 8y agoYou are moving the goalposts now its not all unions just government workers. Forcing them to work against their will would violate their rights. The government can negotiate for their labor or do without it. In the long run they could hire new workers to the the same job nobody is holding anyone hostage.
- seibelj 8y agoGovernment employee unions are the most powerful unions in America. They can choose not to educate society’s children to be paid more. That is a lot of power.