Wikipedia already has a problem with cash injections and not being able to save extra money instead of launching more and more projects. As for the point you'r

Wikipedia already has a problem with cash injections and not being able to save extra money instead of launching more and more projects. As for the point you're making, I disagree as long as the income from one company isn't reaching too big a percentage of their total yearly income. And then again, Firefox clearly wasn't politically subservient to Google, despite most of their income coming from there. So it's not so much an automatic reaction, the internal culture plays a big role. Which is why Wikipedia pre-existing issue with incoming cash usage is a red flag.