5 ms·
Microdobe?
- lyime 18y agoI find the timing of the article pretty ironic. Its interesting that you bring that up. I think you could be right that Adobe would be a good acquisition for Microsoft although merely talking about search Adobe doesn't fit will into that strategy. Microsoft is struggling to capitalize in search space and they obviously find it an important piece of the puzzle. At this moment Yahoo was their best fit in order to increase their market share. I am not quite so sure if they can do that with adobe. Although i think a mash-up of Microsoft and Adobe technologies would be cool to see.
- mattmaroon 18y agoAdobe is clearly not going to help Microsoft with search. I'm just not sure that search isn't a bit of a lost cause for them anyway.
- skmurphy 18y agoFor enterprise search their acquisition of FAST should have a very strong impact. I wouldn't count them out for intranet oriented solutions.
- andreyf 18y agoPartnering with Yahoo would have given them dominant market share in IM and Mail - which means more data to play with to beat Google out of the advertising/search market. Advertising/search brings revenue, unlike Flash or Silverlight. I'm not sure why I'm not seeing it, but could someone expound on what "owning" Flash would even give MS, aside from bragging rights...
- cousin_it 18y agoFlash going under Microsoft control would be a nightmare scenario for me. Noooo!
- jrockway 18y agoIt might be bad enough to get the government involved again. The government killing flash would be awesome.
- cousin_it 18y agoAwesome? It would kill my project and many others, e.g. YouTube. I hope Adobe opens everything up before any of that happens. "In the long run, the utility of all non-free software is zero."
- Hexstream 18y agoHTML will get native video support in the future so we won't need flash for it anymore. http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#video http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#video
- cousin_it 18y agoFlash is good for more than just video. E.g. I think http://samorost2.net http://samorost2.net cannot be reimplemented with existing "open web" technologies. At least I haven't seen any compelling examples.