3 ms·

We have rules, processes, annual trainings, etc. designed to ensure that sensitive data is only kept for reasonable purposes; that access is granted on a need-t

We have rules, processes, annual trainings, etc. designed to ensure that sensitive data is only kept for reasonable purposes; that access is granted on a need-to-know basis; and that people consider both ethics and the law in their decisions. I suspect Apple does too. I have a hard time believing that a company with that rigor intentionally steals trade secrets from one vendor and passes them to another.

jiveturkey 8y ago
And yet, with all that rigor, you still captured and saved sniffed wifi data. And hired and encouraged folks like Levandowski. Caught only by accident. (I know, he wronged Google. Just pointing out that this rigor hasn't stopped characters like Levandowski.) Your rules, processes, trainings are like the shite lock on the door of my house. They are for the honest folks. And by the way, compelled upon you by FCC decree, not taken on voluntarily. This could very easily happen at Google. Not saying it did, just that I am not shocked and surprised that it could. You have >100k staff. You really think they are all so noble?