3 ms·
No its not because the kinds of employment cases that can net $575k in court are typically taken on contingency by the plaintiff's lawyers.
by staticautomatic 8y ago
No its not because the kinds of employment cases that can net $575k in court are typically taken on contingency by the plaintiff's lawyers.
- chimeracoder 8y ago> No its not because the kinds of employment cases that can net $575k in court are typically taken on contingency by the plaintiff's lawyers. "Contingency" doesn't mean it's free. If the case is won (which is the situation we're talking about), the lawyer gets paid out of the net recovery.
- treis 8y agoTypically a third and would obviously still come out way ahead if you do the basic math.
- chimeracoder 8y ago> Typically a third and would obviously still come out way ahead if you do the basic math. Yes, typically 33-45%. As I said in the original comment: > There is definitely a difference, but that has to be adjusted for the difference in expenses as well
- GW150914 8y agoSo it’s somewhere between double and triple the award considering costs. That’s huge and if your point isn't purely pedantic then I’m missing it.