3 ms·
Arguably worse than worseless, when it is actually destructive to society. The history of banking in most countries is the story of a repeated cycle of abusing
by aedron 8y ago
Arguably worse than worseless, when it is actually destructive to society.
The history of banking in most countries is the story of a repeated cycle of abusing the trust of the people with money in the bank: The bank holds people's gold -> the bank issues 'gold certificates' -> the bank issues more certificates than it has gold -> system crashes and everybody loses their money.
In the end, the establishment of national banks to regulate/nationalize the appropriation of wealth.
Here is the history of the Swedish national bank, as an example (it could be copy/pasted from every other European national bank): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sveriges_Riksbank#History https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sveriges_Riksbank#History
- safgasCVS 8y agoSo I'll void preaching to the choir and give you this little gem instead http://uk.businessinsider.com/pubs-replaced-banks-in-ireland-in-1970-and-the-economy-was-fine-2016-1?IR=T http://uk.businessinsider.com/pubs-replaced-banks-in-ireland...
- drb91 8y agoWell, pubs are legitimately the oldest financial structure in ireland. Cheque-central!