3 ms·
You've missed the entire point. This isn't about revealing that he died now. Its about them confidently proclaiming the death was unrelated to the procedure. Th
by nonbel 8y ago
You've missed the entire point. This isn't about revealing that he died now. Its about them confidently proclaiming the death was unrelated to the procedure. There is no way this is justified if he died of "lung infection".
Even if it was that the family was horrified by the partial consciousness and asked for euthanasia, it is still linked to the procedure.