I fail to see how it's a reasonable remark. Does it become unreasonable upon an actual accusation of sexual harassment? If Torvalds were a childless serial mon

I fail to see how it's a reasonable remark. Does it become unreasonable upon an actual accusation of sexual harassment? If Torvalds were a childless serial monogamist, should we be less surprised if it turned out he was secretly sexually harassing women? The remark reflects a false, antiquated view of sexuality and morality. If you want to argue against equivocating sexual harassment with tenuously linked incidental behaviors, it's not a great starting point, to say the least.