I actually agree that this would presumably be a good thing to do. However, that's not because "children dying == bad" but rather precisely because a decent amo

I actually agree that this would presumably be a good thing to do. However, that's not because "children dying == bad" but rather precisely because a decent amount of research appears to have been directed at this idea already. My intent was not to question the merits of the stated goal, but instead to highlight the importance of critical analysis instead of emotionally based lines of thought.