4 ms·
I don't doubt that could be true, and if it's true then it certainly makes sense to spend $ to generate $$. Hopefully not a parallel to overpaid CEOs whose pri
by kprobst 16y ago
I don't doubt that could be true, and if it's true then it certainly makes sense to spend $ to generate $$.
Hopefully not a parallel to overpaid CEOs whose primary responsibility is to generate wealth for the stock holders rather than take care of the employees.
- eru 16y agoYou have it backwards. A CEOs responsibility is to generate shareholder value. If they work to line senior managements' pockets, that's the pathology.