3 ms·
That's a bad example. In technical progress, Chrome is the complete opposite of IE When IE started to _gain_ internet share it was a paragon of technologi
by valarauca1 8y ago
That's a bad example. In technical progress,
Chrome is the complete opposite of IE
When IE started to _gain_ internet share it was a paragon of technological development. It was far faster then navigator, more reactive and performant.
Only little-by-little did Microsoft start adding in features no other browser supported. By the time the mid-late 00's roll around and Chrome was released. IE was this red-headed step child, with a lot of unique Microsoft only extensions.
Chrome is walking the same path, a technological superior browser slowly breaking compatibility with the rest of the web. But in such a way that developers _arent too unhappy_, but enough that most business users, and home users keep using it.
Saying Safari is the new IE is a short sited look at only the tail end of the problem from IE7 or so out. When IE was this slow laggy thing people kept around from Windows XP. Instead you need to look at Chrome like somebody would look at IE4 compared to Netscape Navigator. Sure IE4 breaks standards, but custom webfonts, OpenSSL encryption, ActiveX containers! All these new tools developers can use to make a richer more interactive web experience!
- briandear 8y agoCode formatting quotes makes quotes very difficult to read on mobile. I wonder why we couldn’t just use quotation marks?
- valarauca1 8y agoHN is so non-optimized for mobile to the point of user hostility why bother?