3 ms·
Same was true for IE, IE for instance pioneered asynchronous requests (which is pretty much the norm these days) and things like that - still was a bad browser
by kerng 8y ago
Same was true for IE, IE for instance pioneered asynchronous requests (which is pretty much the norm these days) and things like that - still was a bad browser though.
- SippinLean 8y agoThat's one point of comparison that glosses over Chrome's compliance with standards in stark contrast to IE.
- kerng 8y agoGoogle is just playing the game (embrace, extend, extinguish) - meaning the outcome they try to achieve is the same.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- jjcm 8y agoI think the difference is that IE stopped innovating once they had the market cornered. Chrome is continously on the cutting edge of features and specs, even after it became the #1 browser.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- manigandham 8y agoIt became bad when it stopped making progress, because the team was largely disbanded and the product stagnated in maintenance mode.