4 ms·
There's exactly 0 evidence of this.
by adn 8y ago
There's exactly 0 evidence of this.
- rajaganesh87 8y agoThere's exactly 0 investigation on this
- meowface 8y agoWhat's there to investigate? What's more likely, that people obsessed with social justice latched onto a story about a guy who gave a clinical discussion about rape statistics [1], alleging him to be a rape apologist, or that there's a conspiracy by the US government to smear Linux contributors who don't like backdoors? [1] http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Rape_apology_on_LCA_mailing_list http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Rape_apology_on_LCA_maili...
- programmarchy 8y agoThose two scenarios are not mutually exclusive. For example, terrorists blow people up for religious reasons and states also fund them to attack their enemies.
- meowface 8y agoThey're not mutually exclusive, but someone attempting to connect the two will have to provide some evidence. So far, I've not seen any from anyone. I mean, how exactly would this theory work? Intel/Microsoft/FBI/NSA is paying or fomenting "SJW trolls" to cause havoc and slander anyone who gets in their way of implementing a potential backdoor? What'll happen when they're up against cryptography contributors who are super progressive or have a "clean record"? To me this seems way more likely to be just typical social media outcry and hyperbole with nothing nefarious underneath it. And in this instance, it just happens to have affected someone involved with Linux cryptography.
- nailer 8y agoWhat do you mean? There's tweets in the article targeting him using the CoC. I don't think anyone would dispute he wanted to use multiple entropy sources. What are you disputing?
- joel_ms 8y agoEvidence of a relationship between the two?