3 ms·
That's what this project does. It does signing, just not encryption. I would argue that this is OK legally.
by wedowhatwedo 8y ago
That's what this project does. It does signing, just not encryption. I would argue that this is OK legally.
- tlrobinson 8y agoI understand. I’m suggesting we could allow actual encryption if the messages were also signed such that the sender and recipient (but not the content) were known. Abuse would require two licensed amateurs to cooperate to break the law and use the bands for commercial purposes. It would be easier to investigate suspected abuse (compared to unsigned encrypted messages, but not cleartext messages, of course)