It may not be "on purpose," but it is happening. Creators of algorithms inherently assign their own biases. http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_ten

It may not be "on purpose," but it is happening. Creators of algorithms inherently assign their own biases. http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2015/12/why_google_search_results_favor_democrats.html http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2015/1... http://www.pnas.org/content/112/33/E4512 http://www.pnas.org/content/112/33/E4512 Also note that the top "organic" result on Google's search for "Gun Rights" is just a tag page from NPR. There is no way that's a relevant result. So even if it's not on purpose, it's a very poor result...and given it stands out more so than other keyword searches it seems a bit odd. Edit: down voted for citing study from the National Academy of Sciences, bubbles certainly are thick.