5 ms·
This, essentially, looked like a grander scale version of almost every web design project ever. What is different is that, over time, web teams have learned to
by rossdavidh 8y ago
This, essentially, looked like a grander scale version of almost every web design project ever. What is different is that, over time, web teams have learned to use "mockups" or "wireframes", to put in front of the end recipient some simulation or approximation of what the final result will look like. Why? Because otherwise you get this sequence:
1) end recipient tells you what they want
2) you build that, perhaps exactly
3) they don't like it
Thinking in abstractions, and imagining what that would really look like once implemented, is more or less a job description for programmers. It isn't, for most other jobs, and thus most other people. If you don't do frequent reality checks during the process, you will be quite likely to get this result at the end.
Of course, the students doing the programming in this case, were unlikely to have had multiple software projects' experience, to know this. But someone there should have, and should have insisted on putting sample results in front of parents to see what their theoretical response would be.
I find that management, and probably also politicians, don't like doing that because they can't control how the conversation goes, and it could bring them bad news. But putting that off until the end, brings worse news.
- ghaff 8y agoIsn't that more or less what they did? Having a couple of grad students compute exactly what shifting high school later without costing a lot of extra money sounds sort of like the definition of exploring what the change would look like. ADDED: To be fair, they did try to take the results and try to run with them. It seems as if there would have been less of an issue had they taken the results and did more outreach to find if this was a change parents were actually OK with.
- towelr34dy 8y agoYeap, the article has a very heavy handed one side to it. I mean, it sounds like "Silly users don't like my smart product that no one uses" without considering, maybe, just maybe, the product wasn't good? The author did touched on it a little by mentioning the difficulty for working parents to move their work schedule, but it seemed glossed over. I'd think changes that interfere with the the household bread earners ability to earn would be a serious consideration and a deal breaker for any proposed change. Not to say politics aren't incredibly inefficient and way more emotive than logic prone.