in C-vs-C comparisons on the 1 test file given, dav1d was 60% faster than libaom v1.0.0. But indeed, most of this is not yet very interesting, it looks like cu

in C-vs-C comparisons on the 1 test file given, dav1d was 60% faster than libaom v1.0.0. But indeed, most of this is not yet very interesting, it looks like current git/master libaom has a good amount of SIMD, and in most user testing, it is approximately 4x as fast as dav1d, which does not yet have any SIMD. So at this point, users should probably still use libaom while the kinks are ironed out in dav1d and initial SIMD is added. But keep an eye out over the next few months.