4 ms·
There is some discussion of your paper on math.stackexchange here: https://math.stackexchange.com/a/1900048/24124 https://math.stackexchange.com/a/1900048/24124
by fusiongyro 8y ago
There is some discussion of your paper on math.stackexchange here: https://math.stackexchange.com/a/1900048/24124 https://math.stackexchange.com/a/1900048/24124
I have no idea why you think proving a famous conjecture would endanger your life, but if that is true, HN is probably not able to help. Adding a Hollywood factor to your appeal degrades your work and yourself and is unlikely to generate the kind of attention you want.
- blinom 8y agoYou are true - but it is not Hollywood believe me - it is real life, I will repeat better I proved RH more that year ago, it is in my arxiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.03827up https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.03827up to some corrections in calculus ((almost) final version appear tomorrow) it is right proof. I proved the convexity of the square of modulus of zeta function over x on critical trip. Mr Atiyah many times appear in the in the pictures google search "Blinovsky proved Riemann hypothesis". What will be next - if his proof is wrong (I dot check it) - nothing - if it is also valid - started philosophy that Newton stands on the shoulder of Gians, or something else. Even if I "win", I will not be O, but I will be happy to live next 25 years with my wife Blinovsky Vladimir ps. He devoted his preprint to his wife the same as me :(
- blinom 8y agoPerel'man is Jewis "degraded person", but with good health
- blinom 8y agoeven Wiles much more safe looks not too much happy