> Talking about "attacked for wrongthink" or "are certain that they are not one of the politicians" confirms that suspicion for me. Considering people have bee

> Talking about "attacked for wrongthink" or "are certain that they are not one of the politicians" confirms that suspicion for me. Considering people have been fired for wrongthink, why are you dismissing it so easily? Also, you do realize that plenty marginalized communities ( lgbt, atheists, pro-democracy supporters, feminists, etc ) require a level of anonymity in the US and around the world right? > Long story short: If you want to be an asshole using your real name is probably not a good idea. But why do you want to do that in the first place? There are plenty of legit reasons to be anonymous. Why was the nytimes OP-ed writer working in the Trump administration anonymous? Because he'd be fired for wrongthink. You sound exactly like the chinese government. It's amazing how similar the authoritarian leftists talk and think exactly like the chinese government. There is an absurd amount of pro-censorship and anti-privacy individuals on here all of a sudden. Also, since when is it a good idea to limit free speech, privacy, etc just because of "assholes"? Why aren't you using your real name here if you really believe what you say?