> The purpose of CoC, as stated by its author ... is to eradicate meritocracy. For the sake of clarity, it's important to note here that "meritocracy" is a dee

> The purpose of CoC, as stated by its author ... is to eradicate meritocracy. For the sake of clarity, it's important to note here that "meritocracy" is a deeply contentious word. What "merit" is being rewarded? True technical ability/contribution? Measured how? Or access and privilege (for which it's a misnomer but still often used)? Which definition does the author of the CoC oppose? Which definition do you defend? You obviously intend "eradicate meritocracy" as a condemnation, but some might see eradicating pretend meritocracy as a good thing.