If you haven't noticed, YouTube's ranking mechanisms became more "fraudulent" at least in the recent months. So besides having a service that provides un-editor

If you haven't noticed, YouTube's ranking mechanisms became more "fraudulent" at least in the recent months. So besides having a service that provides un-editorialized blackbox algorithm rankings, this service might also provide a view to purposefully/bugged excluded content. An example of how bad it is, they've started (on purpose or not) removing videos of uploaders that aren't taking part of the YouTube monetarization + have a Patreon link in their description. [0][1] I'd expect/hope that such practice would be suit in EU courts for unfair competition. I wonder how "Fair Trending" implemented their technology, if they are using official YouTube APIs and if Alphabet is going to kill this service once it gains traction? Their about [2] page doesn't answer the "how do we get to the data?". [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18005682 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18005682 [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRB8O08PjnA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRB8O08PjnA [2]: https://www.fairtrending.com/about?lang=en https://www.fairtrending.com/about?lang=en