6 ms·
> The main thrust though, is that this doesn't actually solve anything for end users that the Google Chrome team says it does. Yes it does, it solves the exact
by shawnz 8y ago
> The main thrust though, is that this doesn't actually solve anything for end users that the Google Chrome team says it does.
Yes it does, it solves the exact problem described right in the article. Before this change, there would be a seperate log-in process for Chrome versus every other google service (which normally all share your current login status). Now, your login status is shared between every google service including Chrome, as a layperson would expect. Previously people who wanted to be logged into Chrome AND other google services would have to complete the login process twice which could be confusing for novice users.
- md_ 8y agoIf I’m not mistaken, this also ensures that when you sign out of Gmail, you are signed out of Chrome (no?). That seems like a win for user privacy, insofar as it addresses the likely failure mode of mistakenly leaving the browser signed in after signing out of the website.
- plttn 8y agoYes, this pauses sync when you sign out of Gmail.
- jiggunjer 8y agoNo. Pauses sync but doesn't sign out Chrome. So a person could still see your history/bookmarks/passwords in the logged-in browser. They just can't wipe your cloud data (which I think was the same before this update).
- md_ 8y agoYou mean they can see local history? Sure, but that’s true in most browsers. That’s nothing to do with your signed in state, right?
- jiggunjer 8y agoYes I was thinking about chrome profiles. My mistake. But from what I remember, when you choose to log out, Chrome prompts you if you want to wipe your local data. So logging out locally allows you to protect some data. I think there was a way to log out remotely (tricky/weird way), though again without the local-wipe prompt. I also just tried signing in to chrome (69.0.3497.100), and it tried to sync immediately again, so I'm not sure where the "sync is optional" idea comes from?
- ryandrake 8y ago> there would be a seperate log-in process for Chrome versus every other google service (which normally all share your current login status). Sorry, not much of a Chrome user here. Why would I want to “sign in” to a web browser? I’ve been browsing the web successfully for decades without doing so. I don’t sign in to my text editor either.
- WillPostForFood 8y agoI understand the privacy concerns, but I find it very useful as I go between desktop and laptop often. It syncs bookmarks, history, tabs, settings, autofill, extensions, etc.. There have been plugins for this stuff for decades as well, so it is something that people find useful.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- torstenvl 8y ago> there would be a seperate log-in process for Chrome versus every other google service Chrome is not a Google service. It is a web browser. It should act like one.
- shawnz 8y agoIs that just your opinion, or do you genuinely believe most Chrome users see it that way?
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- dithering 8y agoWe could apply the principle of least astonishment to get a feel for correct behaviour without resorting to sterile arguments about what proportion of users understand the difference between a web site and a web browser. If they looked at a slightly risque URL on their phone, would the average user expect Chrome on their laptop to autocomplete that URL?
- shawnz 8y agoThe current behavior does not activate syncing by default in spite of the slippery slope arguments being made here. Furthermore i think most users would in fact expect syncing like that to work with minimal configuration in this day and age.
- torstenvl 8y agoPlease be civil with people who have a different perspective. The implication that the opposing position is outmoded is not a logical argument, it's an insulting one. "In this day and age," I'd think we could learn to be less dismissive of people.