I don't see any evidence of "dramatic" impact. The objects visible in both images only show minor changes in the confidence score . The objects missing in one i

I don't see any evidence of "dramatic" impact. The objects visible in both images only show minor changes in the confidence score . The objects missing in one image are close to the visualization threshold (50% confidence) in the other. And for the "chair turning into a couch", we don't see the likelihood of the chair, because it's hidden behind the box for the couch. So the dramatic changes seen in the image seem to be artifacts of the visualization and not of the network's performance.