2 ms·
The language is ambiguous, your quote puts together parts of two separate clauses. The people aren't on the block chain, the "law is finalized (by those people
by erikpukinskis 8y ago
The language is ambiguous, your quote puts together parts of two separate clauses.
The people aren't on the block chain, the "law is finalized (by those people) on the blockchain".
So, throughout the day as a judge is making rulings, their clerk is signing transactions on probably an Ethereum dapp.
- ItsMe000001 8y agoWell, yeah, and as I said, I don't understand any of it. The point, I mean. That does not mean that - if I had the power - I would prevent anyone else from going down that route. Quite the opposite, I'm an interested observer, but I wait with judgment until I see something at work in the real world that makes sense to me. So far all I ever see is [insert arbitrary problem here] and then "...and you can do that better with the blockchain" is added. Of course, I may not have the wiring necessary to understand it, just like I can play some kinds of music to some people and they just won't get it. I'll wait and see.