3 ms·

I don't have them handy. It's ok if you don't believe me. It's certainly dangerous with regard to cognitive bias, but I have backing from an excellent doctor w

I don't have them handy. It's ok if you don't believe me. It's certainly dangerous with regard to cognitive bias, but I have backing from an excellent doctor who has noted my results experimentally, so I am convinced of what I'm saying. edit: I would also stress that a lot of things that many of my former doctors were skeptical about were mere symptom reports. I think I would know when my intestines hurt, yet some doctors acted like this was malingering, or a "panic attack" when really I have food allergies (but they wouldn't know that since they gave up from the get go).

YeGoblynQueenne 8y ago
>> I don't have them handy. It's ok if you don't believe me. Who said anything about not believing you (or believing you)? Why jump to conclusions about my mind-state, like that? Can't I just be curious to see what it is you mean, and perhaps learn something I don't know?
- theprotocol 8y ago
  >Who said anything about not believing you (or believing you)? Why jump to conclusions about my mind-state, like that? >Can't I just be curious to see what it is you mean, and perhaps learn something I don't know? Fair enough! I think you're right to ask for sources. What I'm saying there is that I have nothing on hand that would convince you of my claim, so whether you believe me or not is left to you, and if you don't, I will concede that discussion. Since I now know you're only asking out of interest, I guess that point is moot now.