3 ms·
i wouldn't be so critical. It's journalism and I would intrepret the title more as "Machine Learning-community confronts...". And while ML isn't all about NNs
by LeanderK 8y ago
i wouldn't be so critical. It's journalism and I would intrepret the title more as "Machine Learning-community confronts...".
And while ML isn't all about NNs and deep learning, we're quite enticed by them right now and try to push them to see where their limitations are. So I think with a bit more generous interpretation the title is acceptable. I think it's certainly not clickbait, since NNs are right now a very significant part of the ML-research landscape.
- antpls 8y agoWell, to me, this is not journalism. Journalists have a strong ethic and respect for the meaning of words to relay high quality information. This is science vulgarisation, or a magazine article. Not that there is no value in it, but it's an over-generalization.