> That statement sounds too simplified. Having worked with DRM for 10 years, I can confirm that while very simple, that statement is entirely correct. He says

> That statement sounds too simplified. Having worked with DRM for 10 years, I can confirm that while very simple, that statement is entirely correct. He says this is the reason the secure boot process exists, not that this is the only benefit. > How about X, Y, Z Those scenarios certainly benefit from a secure chain of trust but they are not what brought it about. The whole secure boot chain exists because of companies that require DRM to access their content. Samsung wants Netflix to play the best content on their devices. That's the only motivation that has ever mattered to device manufacturers.