3 ms·
There is a way to word that without keeping open a for-profit loophole.
by mikecane 16y ago
There is a way to word that without keeping open a for-profit loophole.
- chris123 16y agoYes, the way it's worded now is ugly and contrasts with the image Twitter seems to like to foster. It should have at least one limitation/stipulation, ideally in non-legalese.