3 ms·
The persistent monitoring afforded by devices such as Apple Watch will directly lead to an increase in the detection rate of any condition that they are capable
by manicdee 8y ago
The persistent monitoring afforded by devices such as Apple Watch will directly lead to an increase in the detection rate of any condition that they are capable of detecting. These new detections will be conditions that had been previously undetected.
Whether you class these as false positives (because the existing test suite doesn't detect them) or false negatives (because the existing test suite should have detected them) is perhaps a matter for debate. The practical outcome is more people living healthier lives because their persistent malaise has finally been identified.
At first I was wondering how scheduling someone for a long-term ECG would cause damage, then I remembered that this feature will only become available in the USA soon. Given that the USA is a country where unexpected health care can destroy a person's life through either bankruptcy or the curse of being a woman/person of colour, yes I agree that detecting a previously undetectable condition could cause damage.
- toast0 8y agoThere has been a lot of recent research and recommendations for policy change around reducing the frequency of screenings for various things. Time and data will surely tell if this type of ECG screening is helpful or harmful on a population level. Certainly, some people will get a secondary ECG indicating intervention is required, and the intervention will improve their lives. Others may have a negative result from the intervention, and may never have found their way into this intervention without this screening. For some, this screening indicating a problem but a full screening indicating nothing will drive persistent anxiety. It is absolutely not the case that more medical intervention is an unqualified good, even ignoring the economic costs.