2 ms·
For practical uses the "shut up and calculate" interpretation of QM works just fine. For a recent head-scratcher, though, see https://www.nature.com/articles/s
by jabl 8y ago
For practical uses the "shut up and calculate" interpretation of QM works just fine.
For a recent head-scratcher, though, see https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-05739-8 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-05739-8
- kgwgk 8y agoThere was some discussion about that paper here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18023452 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18023452 I think it's much less interesting than it seems at first sight. Related (and clearer): In Defense of a "Single-World" Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Jeffrey Bub) https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.03267 https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.03267