3 ms·
This chart doesn't take into account the possibility of errors, though (unless you equate an error to wasted time, which is dubious). Even if you only need to r
by nemo1618 8y ago
This chart doesn't take into account the possibility of errors, though (unless you equate an error to wasted time, which is dubious). Even if you only need to run a command once a year, and it only involves a few short steps, it's worthwhile to automate the task if fat-fingering one of the commands could have disastrous consequences.
- teddyh 8y ago> This chart doesn't take into account the possibility of errors, though This one does: https://xkcd.com/1319/ https://xkcd.com/1319/
- delecti 8y agoAmusingly that actually does the opposite, and takes into account the possibility of errors in your automation, but not in doing it manually.