4 ms·
Kind of agree - however, if the interface elements never move around and stay the same, it's very similar a UX to the instrument panels of old. I.e. not that b
by jacobush 8y ago
Kind of agree - however, if the interface elements never move around and stay the same, it's very similar a UX to the instrument panels of old.
I.e. not that bad, if precaution is taken against information overload in some kind if crisis.
- fermienrico 8y agoI could write a long essay criticizing the obvious drawbacks of this type of implementation. For example, contrast is non-existent. There is just so much stuff that's wrong, I am overwhelmed as I respond.
- zepolen 8y agoYou're completely correct, but the only way people will understand how bad the UI is if they were forced to use it in their daily.
- jacobush 8y agoExactly the opposite might be true - if you used it daily you would be accustomed to where the critical data is and what it looks like. (Ignoring things which are unknown to us - for instance would the operator benefit from trends in data? This does not seem to be present in the UX.)
- TeMPOraL 8y agoPlease do. Because personally, contrast is about the only thing that irks me about this; beyond that, I believe it's a very decent dashboard, with a bit of intentional futuristic style, but otherwise close to zero useless bullshit that plagues the UI fashion of today.