3 ms·
According to GP's linked article it's true when looking at the banking sector as a whole. For a single bank it seems like more of a technicality. Also from the
by pgorczak 8y ago
According to GP's linked article it's true when looking at the banking sector as a whole. For a single bank it seems like more of a technicality.
Also from the article:
> For example, if all of the deposits that a bank held were in the form of instant access accounts, such as current accounts, then the bank might run the risk of lots of these deposits being withdrawn in a short period of time. Because banks tend to lend for periods of many months or years, the bank may not be able to repay all of those deposits — it would face a great deal of liquidity risk.
- neilwilson 8y agoWithdrawals go elsewhere and the central bank system then lends them back to the original source. In aggregate you just end up with a lot of label swapping. All that changes is the cost of the liabilities.
- pgorczak 8y agoIf I swap my labels wrong I can still go bankrupt though.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]