3 ms·
CTRL+D works. You like it. Great use that. You don't think anybody needs an alternative? Or you don't think having an alternative will help at all? Fine. Think
by freeopinion 8y ago
CTRL+D works. You like it. Great use that.
You don't think anybody needs an alternative? Or you don't think having an alternative will help at all? Fine. Think what you want.
One thing's for (mostly) certain: it doesn't hurt. So there's really nothing to complain about.
- Jedd 8y ago> CTRL+D works. You like it. Great use that. You don't think anybody needs an alternative? Or you don't think having an alternative will help at all? Fine. Think what you want. One thing's for (mostly) certain: it doesn't hurt. So there's really nothing to complain about. Not complaining about its presence, as per my comment : "While I think it's great to have both options present,..." Just observing that claims of 'more intuitive' interfaces are very subjective, and that it was unlikely to be a deal breaker for a new user.
- sverhagen 8y agoYou don't think it's intuitive for a command line application that is entirely driven by commands, there to be a command to exit it? Instead of a key combination? I'm used to Ctrl+D now, but it sure took me a while to figure it out. Are we not confusing intuitive with standardized?
- Jedd 8y agoI can't say if anyone else is confusing intuitive with standardised. I can repeat (again) that I think it's great both options are there. Given pretty much all the other 'standard' postgres commands are \[a-z] and sometimes \[a-z][a-z] it sounds like more a complaint about \q