4 ms·
> It is heavily refactored, so don't expect > any backwards compatibility with the original library. Thereby defying the purpose of refactoring code.
by apl 16y ago
> It is heavily refactored, so don't expect
> any backwards compatibility with the original library.
Thereby defying the purpose of refactoring code.
- InnocentB 16y agoIt being a library, refactoring often means that the interfaces are now different. Refactoring should mean your functionality doesn't change, but having interfaces change is normal (and expected). Given that the author isn't modifying the code calling theirs, stuff will inevitably break. You can presumably make an adapter to make it compatible, though in this case I doubt all that's been modified is refactoring.